88. Area of figures with curved boundaries
We have seen already in the
case of the circle that the definition of area with the aid of equalities of decomposition and complementation is not successful. You cannot decompose such figures into squares or complement them into figures, bounded by lines.
The method, which we have applied to the
circle, suggests a solution. We only need to generalize it by
including the area between two
bounds. If you imagine a
figure drawn on millimetre graph paper, one can count the squares
and obtain a first approximation. There arises the difficulty
that the boundary of the figure no longer coincides with that of
the squares. But you can design two bounds, between which the sought area lies. The inner
polygon, from
which you obtain the area Ii by summing all
squares inside the boundary, the outer polygon, from which you obtain the area Io
by including the squares intersected by the boundary,
whence
Io > I > Ii .
If you now use a denser grid of squares, you will obtain new approximate values I 'o and I 'i, so that
Io > I 'o > I > I 'i > Ii ,
where the sequence of the I 'o values decreases and the sequence of the I 'i values increases. They have bounds and approach a definite identical value, whence we have the Definition:
The area
of a figure with a curved boundary is the limit,
which is approached by the areas of the outer
and inner grids with decreasing grid size.
Calculation of area
In practical, approximate computations, you can often
proceed in a more convenient manner. You select a base line AB
and draw AC and BD at right angles to it.
The area, you are to compute, will then appear as the difference
of two areas, each bounded by a curve and three segments.
You now decompose the base line into n equal
segments of length x, draw at the marked points
perpendiculars y0, y1,
etc. and the corresponding chords. Using the formula for the area
of trapezoids, you find now the following approximate values,
which with decreasing width of the strips approximate the
required area:

Alternatively,
you can proceed as follows: You select an even number of strips
and draw tangents through the odd ordinates, which will then
bound the area with the neighbouring ordinate strips of double
width. Then
![]()
If you want to compare the areas of two similar figures,
you decompose both of them by similar grids. Then you will obtain
the same number of squares for the outer and inner sums. But the
squares are in the same ratio as the squares of the similarity
scale a²2 : a²1
= m², whence I2 : I1
= m² : 1 and there follows the Rule:
The
areas of two similar figures are in the same ratio
as the squares of any corresponding segments.
Areas of the mantles of cylinders, cones and truncated cones
If you open a cylinder along a mantle line and spread it out in a plane, you obtain a rectangle, one side of which equals the height and the other the circumference of the base circle of the cylinder, whence the mantle's area is
M = 2p rh.
For the computation of the area of the mantle of a cone, you use the formulae for the circular sector and circular arc. Since equal central angles and equal circular sectors correspond to the same arcs, you have
b : 2p r = a : 360,
whence b = ap r/180 and the area of the corresponding circular sector is
I : p r² = b : 2p r,
that is,
I = br/2.
If
you now imagine the cone cut along a mantle line and unrolled in
the plane, you obtain a circular
sector, the radius of which
is the generator s and the arc of which equals the
circumference of the base of the cone b=2p r. Obviously, you have now the
ratio
M : p s ² = 2p r : 2p s, that is, M = p r s.
By the Ray Theorem,
(x + s)/x = r1/r2,
whence
s/x = (r1 - r2)/r2, that is, x = r2 s/(r1 - r2)
and
M = p (r1 + r2)/s.