A Hermitian form
is positive definite, if for all values of the variable
always
³ 0 and
= 0
only for
= 0. Definite
negative forms
are defined
correspondingly. At times, Hermitian forms H are
referred to as being positive and negative, respectively.
If
is positive definite, certainly the determinant |H|
0, since otherwise the homogeneous, linear system of equations H
= 0 would have a solution
=
0 and therefore
, although a positive definite form can
only vanish for
= 0. The value of a determinant of a negative
definite form must differ from zero for the same reason. Since
the determinant |H| equals the product of the
characteristic roots of H, all characteristic roots of a
[positive or negative] definite Hermitian matrix are not zero.
By means of the principal axes transformation, every Hermitian form can be given the form (32.1) in which the characteristic roots g1, ··· , gn appear as coefficients. However, a form like (32.1) is positive and negative definite if and only if all the characteristic roots gn are positive and negative, respectively.
The Hermitian form
is positve (negative) if and only if all roots of H are
positive (negative).
For a determination of whether a given form is definite, this criterion is, in general, not suitable, because it is laborious to find out whether an algebraic equation of degree n (that is, the characteristic equation of H) has only positive or negative roots.
In order to derive
a more readily handled criterion, you can proceed as follows: If
is
positive definite, as we have just found out, all characteristic
roots of H are positive, whence the determinant |H|
as product of the characteristic roots is also positive. More
over, consider the sectional determinant

of the matrix H.
It shows that for a positive definite form all sectional
determinants are positive. In fact, setting xk+1
= ··· = xn = 0, you obtain from
a
Hermitian form in the variables x1, ··· , xk
, which obviously is also positive definite. A matrix
of this form arises from H by omission of the last n-k
rows and columns, whence its determinant is Hk
and positive like the determinant of every positive definite
form.
The condition for a Hermitian form to be positive definite when all its sectional determinants are positive is formulated in
The Hermitian form
is positive definite if and only if all sectional determinants H1,
··· , Hn are positive; it is negative
definite if the signs of the sequence H1,
··· , Hn alternate and H1
< 0.
Proof: The first part of the rule relating to positive definite forms will be proved first. It has already been shown that in the case of a positive definite form all secitonal determinants are positive. The converse must still be confirmed.
Start from the Hermitean matrix
,
which differs from H only by the bottom right element. As you readily find by expansion with respect to the last column,
![]()
moreover, the Rank of B is n - 1, because the sectional determinant Hn-1 is positive.
Now proceed in a similar manner as during the proof of Theorem 19, where by a transformation matrix, one column of which was an eigenvector, one step was taken towards the diagonal form. The difference between the two proofs is that, in general, the transformation is now not unitary and the eigenvector occurs in the last column.
First of all, you
must find an eigenvector. Since |B| = 0, B has
the number 0 as a characteristic root. The eigenvector
corresponding to 0 is a solution of the system B
= 0.
Due to the Rank B = n - 1 and Hn-1
0, the last of the first n-1 row of B depends
linearly on the first n - 1 rows, so that you can omit
the last equations from the system of equations B
= 0.
Hence
is determined by the system of equations
h11z1
+ ··· + h1nzn
= 0,
······································
···········
hn -1,1z1 + ···
+ hn -1,nzn
= 0.
In view of an observation in Section 27, z1, ··· ,zn
are proportional to the sequence Hn1,
··· ,Hnn of the adjoint minor
determinant of the last row of B or, what is the same,
of H. Since Hnn = Hn-1
0, you can use
z1 = Hn1 /Hn-1, z2 = Hn2 /Hn-1, ··· , zn-1 = Hn,n-1 /Hn-1, zn = 1.
Introduce now into
the Hermitian form
the new varibles
x1 =
yi + Hni
y/Hn-1 (i = 1, , n - 1),
xn = yn.
The Matrix T
of this substitution has as last column the eigenvector
, whence
While
evaluating
, note that due to the equation B
= 0 there
occur only zeroes in the last column of BT, whence also
the last column of
has only zeroes. Because
is a
Hermitian matrix, there must also occur only zeroes in its last
row, whence

Hence also

If now yn = 0, then xi = yi (i = 1, ··· , n - 1) and
![]()
Thus aik = hik (i,k = 1, ··· , n - 1) and (34.1) yields
![]()
On the right hand side of this equation is a Hermitian form in n - 1 variables, the matrix of which arises by stretching of the last row and column. You can split off this form by a corresponding procedure Hn-1|yn-1|²/Hn-2 and obtain a Hermitian form in n - 2 variables, the matrix of which arises from H by omission of the last two rows and columns. Continuing in this manner, you arrive eventually at

You have again obtained a
representation of the Hermitian form as a sum of purely quadratic
terms; however, it is, in general, not an unitary, but only some
non-singular transformation of the variables. This representation
yields now the first half of Theorem 20. In fact, if all
the H1,
··· ,Hn are positive, then
obviously the right hand side of (34.2) is
0. The equality sign can only arise when w1
= ··· = wn = 0; however,
since the wi are linked to the xi
by a non-singular, linear transformation, also all the xi
must vanish.
The second part of Theorem 20 can be reduced to the just concluded case of a positive definite form. In fact, if you multiply all coefficients of a negative definite form by -1, there arises a positive definite form. In the process, the sectional determinant Hk is just multiplied by (-1)k.
Exercises
25. Execute the principal axes transformation for the Hermitian matrix

26. Find the largest and smallest value of the
real quadratic form
, when the variables are subject to the
supplementary condition
.